CHAPTER 25 Dear Grasshopper, Biology can explain everything in its brutish language of eat or be eaten. The balance of our applied values serves either our self-preservation or, in times of emergency, species-preservation by extension of the tribe or family. Yet given evolution is supposed to be a wholly blind process that makes the most of happy and unhappy accidents, it is odd a so-called ‘God Spot’ should emerge in our physiology. Followers of scientism locate this “anomaly” in the brain with a pair of tweezers and see an end to the discussion, as though the mere physical matter was the god sought. This line of reasoning equates the parchment with the message, and the message with the messenger. But to make a hobgoblin of logic in this fashion is to posit value in materialism without value itself being accounted for as material. Buckminster Fuller said he never sought beauty when he set out to work on a scientific problem, but if beauty was not present in the answer, he knew he had it wrong. It is curious “beauty,” a value judgment, should be a consideration in any equation where value has no purchase beyond something either being true or false. |
|
| In truth, reductivists gaze into a starry heaven with just as much wonder as do mystics and theists, though without explaining how anything born of soulless accident should merit soulful reflection. To claim the value we attach to stars is a function of our endorphins may be true as a technical matter, but it is not the thought of endorphins that induces endorphins—it is the thought of something “immaterially” bigger than ourselves. ~Omar | |
|
THE CHILD, Part Two The young woman made a cell phone call while still at the deli, and Michael, knowing she was calling Evan, or his machine, cleared off to the parking lot to wait for her. He watched her through the large plate glass window, as he was always watching her through glass. Her spirits seemed to rally as she spoke, as if to hide with her face what deceit she conveyed with her words. Perhaps it was a pantomime intended strictly for the painter's consumption; yet he could not say whether such a performance would be to encourage or dissuade his hope. The glass, in many ways, was all that was left to separate them—would always be the slimmest of things to separate them. Emma came back to the car wearing a haggard smile, and he knew (if he knew nothing else) she would not be leaving town anytime soon.
Michael looked stonily out the windshield, striking a pose for what he wanted to say. “Emma,” he began confidently, “I want to take financial responsibility for you. For your education. For your child.” She turned her eyes from the to-doings out the passenger window. “What?” “You can go to another school, and I will pay your way.” The young woman could not help but laugh a little. “But you can barely take care of yourself.” Her comment succeeded in deflating him. She reached over to stroke his hand on the steering wheel. “I don’t want you acting out of pity, or duty, or anything like that.” “I wouldn’t put it in those terms.” “Then what terms would you use?” He would not say.
Michael continued on into the bedroom, where he spied the hand of the mannequin sticking out from under the bed. He got down on his knees to eye it in the dark recess. Silken cobwebs so perfectly hugged the figure’s contours they must have been spun in place over a long time. He let his fingers light reflexively on his Galatea’s clavicle, and with little effort tore open her gauzy gown down to the pubic bone. The sticky tatters were pushed off over a breast and hip, and with complete indifference to any spiders that might be lurking in them. The man could not explain his paradoxical feelings: how the quality of impersonality made the plaster woman both sexual and untouchable at the same time. Somehow, he reasoned, it was when things got personal that these two irreconcilable poles (object and ideal) found a happy if imperfect medium. And maybe this was his great failing: He had not kept faith with love long enough for it to produce a workable solution to his conundrum. As an incurable romantic he was in love with love, yet had no faith in the concept as a practical matter. Impersonality may have been cold and austere, but it was never cruel. But to be in love, body and soul, was to invite cruelty. Perhaps in hindsight the intended recipients of his affection had appreciated this impersonality so telling in him. And whether they perceived his interest as being wholly sexual or blindly romantic in nature, no woman in his crosshairs wanted to be a means to an end. Yet the only things transparently clear about Michael were the frankness and naiveté of his heart—not his motives; and this, in an impartial view, rendered his means and ends virtually indistinguishable. Returning to his feet, he looked over the sea of dresses still in the floor, finally seeing them for what they really were: one half man snare and one half means to a girl playing dress-up. In truth Emma was the young woman he had never understood as a young man, but this acknowledgement came only with the irony of years; and only with the understanding a misunderstanding existed. The wedding dress rose above the others in a dim, ankle-high cloud. Michael picked it up as he had picked up the stargazer lily two days before. Omar once wrote telling him symbols stood halfway between this world and the next. For the uncommunicative man, however, it was only vagueness he aspired to as a next move. Historically this indeterminism meant his actions in emerging romantic situations were chronically too much of something: too abrupt, too early, too overpowering, too indecisive, too finagled, too late… All these miscalculations stemmed from the woman being too female for his logic to get around. |
Chapter Twenty-five, Section Two/ Back/ Contents Page Copyright © 2007 Michael Teague. All rights reserved. |